Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Vote
Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1
Result
563 for · 73 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/1
Vote id
181863
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 563 for, 73 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘with that in mind, considering that Norway’s EU membership would strengthen both its national interests and the EU’s geopolitical resilience by closing critical gaps in the latter’s collective defence – notably in the GIUK gap’ and ‘and Norway’s potential EU accession’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 13Against 22Abst. 3No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
GreensFor 49Against 1Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 1No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 170Against 0Abst. 6No vote 12 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 65Against 3Abst. 3No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 69Against 12Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 1Against 17Abst. 3No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 6Against 17Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark310
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1100
Ireland501
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal100
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 595 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 594 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 598 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Separate vote521 for, 66 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.77 552 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 560 voters
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.76 527 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineFinal446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.75 517 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 259 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote471 for, 85 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 598 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote492 for, 70 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 541 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 251 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote472 for, 64 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 595 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181863, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181863 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181863,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181863}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181863},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181863, reference 2025/2116(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}