Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Vote: Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e
Decision: No. 8 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result: 89 for · 523 against · 44 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 26 November 2025, 12:32

More facts (6)

Position: vote 7 of 25 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN
Official label: A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, after point e – Am 3
Text: Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier: 2025/2116(INI)
Vote id: 181859

Position: vote 7 of 25 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: ESN
Official label: A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, after point e – Am 3
Text: Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier: 2025/2116(INI)
Vote id: 181859

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 14 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 1	Against 30	Abst. 8	No vote 7 of 46	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.65
Greens	For 0	Against 51	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 1	Against 123	Abst. 1	No vote 11 of 136	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
Renew	For 0	Against 68	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 75	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 8	Against 164	Abst. 0	No vote 16 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
ECR	For 8	Against 60	Abst. 5	No vote 6 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.73
Patriots	For 40	Against 14	Abst. 27	No vote 4 of 85	Majority line For	Clear line Divided	Cohesion 0.24
ESN	For 20	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 27	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 11	Against 13	Abst. 3	No vote 3 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0	0–2–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	1–2–0	0–2–0	0–0–3	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0
Cyprus	0–1–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	0–2–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–4–0	0–3–0	0–8–1	1–0–0	2–0–0
Germany	0–4–0	0–14–0	0–13–0	0–8–0	0–29–0	no member voted	no member voted	12–0–0	0–8–1
Denmark	1–0–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–2–0	0–0–1	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	0–2–0	0–4–0	0–18–0	0–1–0	1–20–0	0–2–0	0–0–6	no member voted	1–0–0
Finland	0–3–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	0–7–0	0–4–0	1–11–0	0–11–0	5–0–0	4–0–0	29–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Greece	0–4–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted	0–6–0	2–0–0	0–0–1	no member voted	0–2–1
Croatia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–4–0	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	0–5–0	no member voted	10–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted
Ireland	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–6–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	0–1–8	0–4–0	0–20–0	no member voted	0–8–0	0–21–0	0–0–6	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Latvia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–0–1	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–1	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–5–0	0–5–0	0–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–22–0	0–19–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–0–1
Portugal	0–1–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–1–0	0–7–0	no member voted	0–0–2	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	0–1–0	0–10–0	0–3–0	0–10–0	0–5–1	no member voted	no member voted	1–1–0
Sweden	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–5–0	0–0–3	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–2–0	0–4–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.
Belgium	0	2	0
Bulgaria	0	1	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Czechia	0	3	0
Denmark	0	0	1
Estonia	0	1	0
Spain	0	2	0
Finland	1	0	0
France	4	0	0
Greece	2	0	0
Croatia	0	1	0
Italy	0	21	0
Lithuania	0	1	0
Latvia	0	3	0
Netherlands	0	1	0
Poland	0	19	0
Romania	0	5	1
Sweden	0	0	3

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 656 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Adam JARUBAS group that day: EPP · Poland
Alberico GAMBINO group that day: ECR · Italy
Aldo PATRICIELLO group that day: Patriots · Italy
Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Andrey KOVATCHEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Anja ARNDT group that day: ESN · Germany
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Anouk VAN BRUG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Antonio DECARO group that day: S&D · Italy
Aodhán Ó RÍORDÁIN group that day: S&D · Ireland
Aurelijus VERYGA group that day: ECR · Lithuania
Axel VOSS group that day: EPP · Germany
Birgit SIPPEL group that day: S&D · Germany
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Brigitte VAN DEN BERG group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Catarina MARTINS group that day: The Left · Portugal
César LUENA group that day: S&D · Spain
Chiara GEMMA group that day: ECR · Italy
Chloé RIDEL group that day: S&D · France
Christophe GOMART group that day: EPP · France
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Eero HEINÄLUOMA group that day: S&D · Finland
Elena YONCHEVA group that day: No group · Bulgaria
Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS group that day: EPP · Greece
Eva MAYDELL group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Francisco ASSIS group that day: S&D · Portugal
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
György HÖLVÉNYI group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Jérémy DECERLE group that day: Renew · France
Joanna SCHEURING-WIELGUS group that day: S&D · Poland
João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO group that day: Renew · Portugal
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Karlo RESSLER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Katri KULMUNI group that day: Renew · Finland
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Kostas PAPADAKIS group that day: No group · Greece
Majdouline SBAI group that day: Greens · France
Manuela RIPA group that day: EPP · Germany
Michal WIEZIK group that day: Renew · Slovakia
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Niels FUGLSANG group that day: S&D · Denmark
Pernando BARRENA ARZA group that day: The Left · Spain
Péter MAGYAR group that day: EPP · Hungary
Rada LAYKOVA group that day: ESN · Bulgaria
Radan KANEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Romana TOMC group that day: EPP · Slovenia
Sander SMIT group that day: EPP · Netherlands
Sandra GÓMEZ LÓPEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Sandro GOZI group that day: Renew · France
Sarah KNAFO group that day: ESN · France
Silvia SARDONE group that day: Patriots · Italy
Stanislav STOYANOV group that day: ESN · Bulgaria
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Tobiasz BOCHEŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Tomasz BUCZEK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Tomasz FROELICH group that day: ESN · Germany
Younous OMARJEE group that day: The Left · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and Herzegovina	Amendment	133 for, 531 against, 20 abstained Rejected	For 19 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.85 623 voters
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Amendment	112 for, 479 against, 38 abstained Rejected	For 18 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.85 579 voters
8 Jul 2025	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 28 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2024	Amendment	127 for, 511 against, 28 abstained Rejected	For 19 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.84 609 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 1 to paragraph 10 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024	Amendment	79 for, 541 against, 40 abstained Rejected	For 12 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.83 602 voters
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 13 to recital C 2023 and 2024 reports on Albania	Amendment	133 for, 536 against, 21 abstained Rejected	For 19 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.83 629 voters
21 May 2026	Amendment 6 to recital Y The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Amendment	122 for, 432 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 22 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.83 520 voters
12 Mar 2025	Amendment 8, adding text after recital U Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression	Amendment	100 for, 541 against, 19 abstained Rejected	For 15 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.82 603 voters
12 Mar 2025	Amendment 7, adding text after recital U Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression	Amendment	95 for, 535 against, 26 abstained Rejected	For 14 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.82 600 voters
9 Jul 2025	Amendment 19 to paragraph 7 2023 and 2024 reports on Georgia	Amendment	107 for, 551 against, 25 abstained Rejected	For 16 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.82 625 voters
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure	Amendment	130 for, 473 against, 30 abstained Rejected	For 21 %	Requested by Members	r · shared0.82 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic Resolution · report by Urmas Paet 26 Nov 2025 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point c — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point o Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ad — part 3 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025
Vote EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic — Paragraph 1, point ag — part 2 Roll-call vote · 26 Nov 2025 26 Nov 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181859
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181859, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181859 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181859,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3 to paragraph 1, after point e — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181859}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181859},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181859, reference 2025/2116(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}