Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 1, point e

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 1, point e
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result
532 for · 85 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:32
More facts (5)
Position
vote 5 of 25 on the decision
Official label
A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point e
Text
Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier
2025/2116(INI)
Vote id
181857
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 80 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 31Abst. 5No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
GreensFor 48Against 3Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 65Against 2Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 175Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 71Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 40Against 6Abst. 34No vote 5 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 6Against 18Abst. 3No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
24 Oct 2024Final vote — text as a whole People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around TaiwanFinal432 for, 60 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.88 518 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 259 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote471 for, 85 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 599 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote443 for, 73 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 546 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 596 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 600 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 596 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote476 for, 71 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 592 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.85 563 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 22 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment523 for, 76 against, 72 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 616 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Military MobilityFinal493 for, 127 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.84 622 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181857
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 1, point e — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181857, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181857 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181857,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 1, point e — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181857}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181857},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181857, reference 2025/2116(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}