Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point a — part 1

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Vote
Paragraph 1, point a — part 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 26 Nov 2025
Result
627 for · 5 against · 26 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
26 November 2025, 12:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: The Left
Official label
A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point a/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0229
Dossier
2025/2116(INI)
Vote id
181852
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 627 for, 5 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 95 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘particularly due to Russia’s extensive military restructuring, including the establishment of the Maritime Collegium’ and ‘in combination with China’s clear interest in the region,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 175Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 59Against 3Abst. 17No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.62
ESNFor 16Against 1Abst. 5No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
No groupFor 24Against 1Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1100
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland100
Portugal100
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181852
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic”. Vote, 26 November 2025. votingId 181852, reference 2025/2116(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181852 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 26 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-26/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-26-181852,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 — EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181852}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-26/181852},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181852, reference 2025/2116(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-26-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-26 (CC BY 4.0)}
}