Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital J — part 2

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Recital J — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
366 for · 245 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital J/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0196
Dossier
2025/2013(INI)
Vote id
181655
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 57 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 18Against 13Abst. 5No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 1Abst. 9No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 65Against 1Abst. 1No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 116Against 45Abst. 4No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.55
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 1No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 6Against 14Abst. 9No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia090
Denmark010
Spain051
France0280
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland010
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.88 583 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 66 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Split vote367 for, 256 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.87 593 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 4 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote326 for, 272 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.87 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 121 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote362 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 527 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote369 for, 267 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 610 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 5 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote362 for, 283 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 610 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 14 — part 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Split vote357 for, 271 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.85 590 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote339 for, 299 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 604 voters
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 12 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSeparate vote334 for, 286 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.83 584 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 44 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote381 for, 275 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181655
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital J — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181655, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181655 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181655,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital J — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181655}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181655},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181655, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}