Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital J — part 1

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Recital J — part 1
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
411 for · 202 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – Recital J/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0196
Dossier
2025/2013(INI)
Vote id
181654
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas the Draghi report also points out that the EU’s decision-making rules have not substantially evolved with EU enlargement and that they need to be strengthened and streamlined in view of future enlargements and the complex global environment;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 9Against 14Abst. 9No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.16
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 0Abst. 5No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 160Against 5Abst. 2No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 4Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 72Abst. 6No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 21Abst. 1No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1100
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal100
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 636 members

No vote recorded, 83

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 83 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote372 for, 134 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.92 504 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassmentSplit vote380 for, 173 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 501 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitivenessFinal366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.91 530 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.91 510 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.91 589 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote369 for, 212 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.91 554 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 517 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 11 — part 2 Clean Industrial DealSplit vote378 for, 177 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 508 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 554 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181654
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital J — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181654, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181654 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181654,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital J — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181654}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181654},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181654, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}