Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 22 — part 2

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Paragraph 22 — part 2
Decision
No. 11 of the sitting of 25 Nov 2025
Result
322 for · 289 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 22/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0196
Dossier
2025/2013(INI)
Vote id
181650
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 322 for, 289 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 1Abst. 2No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 56Against 2Abst. 8No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
EPPFor 60Against 97Abst. 8No vote 23 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ECRFor 0Against 72Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 11No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany216
Spain010
France001
Greece031
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia041

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 102 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSeparate vote291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 551 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardSplit vote306 for, 225 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 520 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Banking Union – annual report 2025Split vote263 for, 310 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 222 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.81 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.80 560 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively — Ams 1-10, 13, 18-25, 27-30, 32-35, 37, 40 Framework for achieving climate neutralityOther396 for, 229 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.80 585 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.80 569 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment277 for, 349 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 581 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 591 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.80 616 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181650
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 22 — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181650, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181650 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181650,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 22 — part 2 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181650}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181650},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181650, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}