Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 22 — part 1

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Paragraph 22 — part 1
Result
463 for · 162 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 22/1
Vote id
181649
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 463 for, 162 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Underlines that achieving the EU’s competitiveness goals requires embedding climate neutrality and sustainability objectives within the EU’s institutional and governance framework;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 2Abst. 1No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 159Against 9Abst. 1No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 12No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 19Against 1Abst. 3No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 11Against 11Abst. 7No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Czechia010
Germany1301
France100
Hungary100
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote450 for, 171 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.92 579 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 4 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote432 for, 178 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 576 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 564 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.86 580 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 534 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote424 for, 141 against, 1 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Greens, Patriots, ECRr · shared0.85 518 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote433 for, 161 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 565 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Final388 for, 186 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.85 554 voters
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 603 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 20 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote432 for, 145 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 22 — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181649, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181649 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181649,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 22 — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181649}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181649},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181649, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}