Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 12 — part 1

Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)

Vote
Paragraph 12 — part 1
Result
385 for · 226 against · 35 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 20 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0196/2025 – Brando Benifei – § 12/1
Vote id
181646
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 385 for, 226 against, 35 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 60 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘notes that the Draghi report proposes that where unanimous agreement to introduce QMV cannot be reached, willing Member States could also consider resorting to intergovernmental cooperation;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 9Abst. 1No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 113Against 3Abst. 5No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 64Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 127Against 37Abst. 8No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 5Abst. 17No vote 4 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.61
No groupFor 4Against 21Abst. 4No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany261
Spain010
France001
Greece130
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania011
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.86 588 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 66 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025Split vote367 for, 256 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.86 592 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 4 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote326 for, 272 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 576 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 14 — part 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Split vote357 for, 271 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.85 589 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 121 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote362 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 529 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 45 — part 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote369 for, 267 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 609 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.83 592 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 44 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Split vote381 for, 275 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 607 voters
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 12 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSeparate vote334 for, 286 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.83 590 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 2 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote408 for, 192 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 12 — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181646, reference 2025/2013(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181646 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181646,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 12 — part 1 — Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181646}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181646},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181646, reference 2025/2013(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}