Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital G — part 2

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Vote
Recital G — part 2
Result
254 for · 335 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 83 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – Recital G/2
Vote id
181316
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 254 for, 335 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 2No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 106Against 2Abst. 1No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 55Against 2Abst. 4No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 5Against 154Abst. 5No vote 24 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 1No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 2No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 8Against 12Abst. 3No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Germany1300
Denmark020
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland200
France1000
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Italy1600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta101
Netherlands400
Poland200
Portugal800
Romania200
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 111

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 111 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 500 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.96 565 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 504 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.95 581 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 490 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 509 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 559 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.94 540 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 490 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital G — part 2 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181316, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181316 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181316,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital G — part 2 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181316}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181316},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181316, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}