Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 74 — part 1

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Vote
Paragraph 74 — part 1
Result
397 for · 170 against · 44 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 54 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 74/1
Vote id
181280
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 397 for, 170 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to allocate targeted funding to Permanent Representations to enable them to effectively carry out this task’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 3No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 135Against 23Abst. 4No vote 26 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 4No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 2Against 66Abst. 8No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 0Against 5Abst. 17No vote 5 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.66
No groupFor 6Against 9Abst. 8No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria300
Germany600
Denmark202
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland200
France1300
Ireland401
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Romania100
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 562 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 3 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 564 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 558 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 577 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 209 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 563 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 563 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 562 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 505 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote417 for, 199 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 561 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumFinal422 for, 219 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.89 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 74 — part 1 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181280, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181280 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181280,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 74 — part 1 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181280}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181280},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181280, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}