Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 73

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 73
Decision
No. 22 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
279 for · 289 against · 42 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 53 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew, S&D · separate vote: Members
Official label
A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 73
Text
Report A-10-2025-0210
Dossier
2024/2125(INI)
Vote id
181278
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 46 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 2Abst. 1No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 4No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 25Against 124Abst. 14No vote 25 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
ECRFor 0Against 61Abst. 11No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 0Against 68Abst. 7No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 12Abst. 5No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 28 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote289 for, 309 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ESN, EPPr · shared0.89 555 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.89 468 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital P Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment282 for, 334 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 547 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 99 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 563 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.88 583 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote327 for, 272 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 554 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.87 542 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 513 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 56 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote271 for, 331 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.87 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181278
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 73 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181278, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181278 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181278,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 73 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181278}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181278},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181278, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}