Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 72 — part 1

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Vote
Paragraph 72 — part 1
Decision
No. 22 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
396 for · 183 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 50 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 72/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0210
Dossier
2024/2125(INI)
Vote id
181275
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 396 for, 183 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ and ‘and to ensure that the next MFF contains strengthened gender equality targets in external actions with 85 % of all EU official development assistance (ODA) mainstreaming gender (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) marker G1) and 20 % of ODA dedicated to gender-targeted projects (OECD marker 2);’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 121Against 19Abst. 19No vote 29 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
ECRFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 9Against 65Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 8Abst. 7No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France030
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy0200
Lithuania010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0190
Romania050
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 111

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 111 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 573 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 550 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 42 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote461 for, 186 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 571 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 560 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote355 for, 177 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greens, The Leftr · shared0.89 478 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 555 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote431 for, 184 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 557 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 549 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BH — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote420 for, 188 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.89 559 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumFinal422 for, 219 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.89 574 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181275
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 72 — part 1 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181275, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181275 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181275,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 72 — part 1 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181275}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181275},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181275, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}