Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 2

Gender Equality Strategy 2025

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 2
Decision
No. 22 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
295 for · 302 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 12:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0210/2025 – Marko Vešligaj – § 10/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0210
Dossier
2024/2125(INI)
Vote id
181222
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 295 for, 302 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “, including due to law enforcement practices”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 3Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 28Against 129Abst. 4No vote 27 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 1Against 70Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 0No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 6Abst. 3No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia001
Germany500
Spain010
France010
Greece210
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia312

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 604 members

No vote recorded, 114

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 114 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.93 466 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment282 for, 334 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 540 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital P Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 475 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote294 for, 282 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 502 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote264 for, 292 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Greens, Patriots, ECRr · shared0.89 477 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 512 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 499 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 31 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment284 for, 281 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.89 502 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 511 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 504 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181222
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181222, reference 2024/2125(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181222 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181222,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Gender Equality Strategy 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181222}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181222},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181222, reference 2024/2125(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}