Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16, after paragraph 9

Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit

Vote
Amendment 16, after paragraph 9
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2025
Result
121 for · 335 against · 110 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0471/2025 – After § 9 – Am 16
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0474
Dossier
2025/2933(RSP)
Vote id
180525
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 121 for, 335 against, 110 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 20 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 40Against 1Abst. 3No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
S&DFor 21Against 2Abst. 81No vote 32 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.67
RenewFor 5Against 56Abst. 1No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 18Against 128Abst. 1No vote 41 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 0Against 58Abst. 7No vote 14 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 0Against 59Abst. 10No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 10Against 9Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
Ireland200
Italy800
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 566 members

No vote recorded, 153

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 153 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 391 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 388 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.78 486 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital B The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment164 for, 288 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 402 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 529 voters
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Freedom Flotilla Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Freedom FlotillaOther164 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 38 %r · shared0.78 338 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 353 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.78 488 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 39 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment99 for, 424 against, 121 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 509 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksAmendment83 for, 354 against, 110 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 447 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksAmendment89 for, 360 against, 120 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 470 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180525
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16, after paragraph 9 — Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180525, reference 2025/2933(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180525 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180525,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16, after paragraph 9 — Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola Summit}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180525}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180525},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180525, reference 2025/2933(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}