Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 71 — part 1

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Vote
Paragraph 71 — part 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2025
Result
439 for · 100 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0450/2025 – § 71/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0450
Dossier
2025/2618(RSP)
Vote id
180288
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 439 for, 100 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission to ensure coordination in the implementation of the Environmental Crime Directive, the Wildlife Trade Regulation and the revised EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and other relevant EU policies such as the Digital Services Act;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 61Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 140Against 5Abst. 1No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 52Against 6Abst. 4No vote 17 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 0Against 59Abst. 8No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 7Abst. 14No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland300
France700
Ireland200
Italy800
Portugal101
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 537 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.91 527 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.90 519 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.90 528 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.90 516 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal437 for, 112 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.90 474 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 517 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal538 for, 96 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.89 523 voters
26 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesFinal519 for, 99 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.89 535 voters
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180288
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 71 — part 1 — Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180288, reference 2025/2618(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180288 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180288,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 71 — part 1 — Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180288}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180288},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180288, reference 2025/2618(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}