Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 67 — part 1

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Vote
Paragraph 67 — part 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2025
Result
473 for · 51 against · 43 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Patriots
Official label
B10-0450/2025 – § 67/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0450
Dossier
2025/2618(RSP)
Vote id
180285
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 473 for, 51 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 83 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘which in its gravest form should be recognised as ecocide’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 1Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 3Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 134Against 8Abst. 5No vote 41 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 55Against 0Abst. 6No vote 18 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 28Against 31Abst. 7No vote 19 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
ESNFor 1Against 3Abst. 18No vote 5 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 15Against 5Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia002
Germany701
Spain001
France100
Greece301
Luxembourg100
Poland010
Romania100
Slovakia141

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 567 members

No vote recorded, 152

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 152 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180285
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 67 — part 1 — Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180285, reference 2025/2618(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180285 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180285,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 67 — part 1 — Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180285}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180285},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180285, reference 2025/2618(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}