Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 39

UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 39
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2025
Result
170 for · 398 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 51 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
B10-0445/2025 – After § 39 – Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0445
Dossier
2025/2666(RSP)
Vote id
180258
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 170 for, 398 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 106Abst. 0No vote 30 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 59Abst. 1No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 12Against 134Abst. 1No vote 41 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 54Against 10Abst. 0No vote 15 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 11Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0120
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland020
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

No vote recorded, 146

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 146 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 56 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment184 for, 448 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 528 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 48 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 419 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 510 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment186 for, 446 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 529 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesAmendment186 for, 447 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 535 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Recruitment of children by organised crimeAmendment169 for, 389 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 474 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 36 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment202 for, 423 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 509 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 524 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 30 to citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 535 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment194 for, 451 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 530 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.92 528 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180258
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 39 — UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180258, reference 2025/2666(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180258 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180258,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 39 — UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180258}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180258},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180258, reference 2025/2666(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}