Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 20 Oct 2025
Result
124 for · 281 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
20 October 2025, 18:12
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group
Vote id
179910
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 124 for, 281 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 20Abst. 2No vote 24 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 1No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 82Abst. 0No vote 54 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 42Abst. 2No vote 31 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 11Against 90Abst. 6No vote 81 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 43 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 57Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 13Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
No groupFor 7Against 5Abst. 4No vote 14 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia100
Germany901
Hungary100
Poland100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 421 members

No vote recorded, 298

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 298 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 445 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 382 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment213 for, 415 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 379 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment202 for, 441 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 387 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 45 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment198 for, 445 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 389 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 377 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 370 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.93 390 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 377 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 375 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.93 310 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-20/179910
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group”. Vote, 20 October 2025. votingId 179910. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-20/179910 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 20 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 20 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-20, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-20/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-20-179910,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-20},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-20/179910}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-20/179910},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179910. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-20-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-20 (CC BY 4.0)}
}