Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 27 — part 3

United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure

Vote
Paragraph 27 — part 3
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
204 for · 380 against · 16 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 32 of 49 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: S&D, Renew, ECR, Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 27/3
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0437
Dossier
2025/2901(RSP)
Vote id
179756
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 204 for, 380 against, 16 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “is convinced that any Member State that opposes recourse to the European Peace Facility in such cases contravenes its duty of loyalty and solidarity under Article 24(3) TEU and its obligation of mutual aid and assistance enshrined in Article 42(7) TEU; considers, therefore, that an opposing vote may not be considered in the Council; recalls that constructive abstention should be possible for those Member States whose constitutional prerogatives require it;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 32Abst. 4No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
GreensFor 30Against 12Abst. 2No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
S&DFor 10Against 88Abst. 0No vote 38 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 2Against 58Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 150Against 11Abst. 4No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 6Against 60Abst. 2No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 3Against 22Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany030
Denmark001
Spain020
Finland003
France080
Greece010
Ireland030
Italy090
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 600 members

No vote recorded, 119

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 119 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 107, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment314 for, 322 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 558 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment316 for, 281 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 544 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 69 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote305 for, 309 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.58 560 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 6 The upcoming European Research Area (ERA) ActAmendment283 for, 262 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.58 516 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote327 for, 235 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.58 524 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote334 for, 259 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.57 529 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitivenessFinal318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.57 542 voters
13 Nov 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew and PPE groups Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew and PPE groupsOther309 for, 191 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 58 %r · shared0.55 448 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.55 550 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment248 for, 378 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.55 540 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179756
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 27 — part 3 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179756, reference 2025/2901(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179756 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179756,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 27 — part 3 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179756}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179756},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179756, reference 2025/2901(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}