Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 1
Result
361 for · 210 against · 41 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 49 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 10/1
Vote id
179742
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 361 for, 210 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Calls for advances towards a European command-and-control structure that not only manages crises in line with the common security and defence policy (CSDP), but also serves as the equivalent of NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE);’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 34Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 4No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 87Against 4Abst. 9No vote 36 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
RenewFor 57Against 2Abst. 1No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 163Against 2Abst. 7No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 4Against 60Abst. 4No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 1Against 64Abst. 12No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Germany600
Denmark301
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1100
Ireland300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands320
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden200
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 35 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote377 for, 231 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 559 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 505 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.89 500 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 38 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote389 for, 234 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 569 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.87 569 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.87 539 voters
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSeparate vote434 for, 235 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 574 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.87 569 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.87 474 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179742, reference 2025/2901(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179742 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179742,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179742}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179742},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179742, reference 2025/2901(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}