Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 3

United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 3
Result
356 for · 218 against · 39 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 49 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0419/2025 – § 9/3
Vote id
179740
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “insists on the urgent need to move towards a genuine European Defence Union, complementing NATO, and building on and going further than current frameworks such as that provided in the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 31Abst. 5No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 91Against 4Abst. 6No vote 35 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 3No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 154Against 6Abst. 11No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 5Against 58Abst. 5No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 2Against 20Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Germany171
Spain010
France001
Greece031
Luxembourg001
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 506 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 508 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.91 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.91 569 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote420 for, 222 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 576 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote411 for, 202 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 554 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 38 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote389 for, 234 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 571 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.90 569 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceFinal393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 539 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.89 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 9 — part 3 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179740, reference 2025/2901(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179740 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179740,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 3 — United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179740}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179740},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179740, reference 2025/2901(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}