Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 3

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
123 for · 459 against · 33 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0170/2025 – Fredis Beleris – After § 3 – Am 3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0170
Dossier
2025/2114(INI)
Vote id
179618
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 123 for, 459 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 4No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 23Against 74Abst. 3No vote 36 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
RenewFor 6Against 55Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 6Against 149Abst. 18No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 2Against 67Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 1Against 75Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 5Against 15Abst. 7No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia200
Germany261
Spain010
France001
Greece103
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia031

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 615 members

No vote recorded, 104

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 104 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 571 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment105 for, 538 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 569 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment111 for, 494 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.77 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment117 for, 498 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.77 538 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment117 for, 536 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 569 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment119 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 533 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 13 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment127 for, 486 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.76 540 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 81, adding text after paragraph 17 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment129 for, 499 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 552 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 27 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 486 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 536 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179618
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 3 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179618, reference 2025/2114(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179618 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179618,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 3 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179618}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179618},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179618, reference 2025/2114(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}