Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Second World Summit for Social Development

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
360 for · 210 against · 37 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:33
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 25 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0408/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0408
Dossier
2025/2654(RSP)
Vote id
179617
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 96Against 0Abst. 3No vote 37 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 43Against 12Abst. 5No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
EPPFor 125Against 33Abst. 14No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.59
ECRFor 0Against 66Abst. 2No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 68Abst. 7No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
France300
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AF Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote285 for, 198 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 442 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesFinal420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.88 551 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.88 409 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSeparate vote379 for, 180 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 534 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote307 for, 146 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 440 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 1 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment418 for, 180 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 536 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment362 for, 243 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 547 voters
23 Oct 2024Final vote Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesFinal444 for, 179 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.84 548 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 17 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote367 for, 214 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 521 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyFinal385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.84 497 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179617
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the whole text — Second World Summit for Social Development”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179617, reference 2025/2654(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179617 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179617,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Second World Summit for Social Development}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179617}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179617},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179617, reference 2025/2654(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}