Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 1

Second World Summit for Social Development

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 1
Result
479 for · 68 against · 64 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP, ECR
Official label
B10-0408/2025 – § 13/1
Vote id
179607
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Urges the EU and its Member States to ensure that the green transition is socially just, with specific support for workers, households, regions and enterprises affected by structural changes and new labour market demands; notes that climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, if carefully designed through robust social dialogue, can generate resilient economic ecosystems, quality jobs, sustainable enterprises and more inclusive societies, leaving no one behind;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 99Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 58Against 0Abst. 3No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 170Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 53Against 13Abst. 2No vote 11 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 0Against 23Abst. 54No vote 8 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.55
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria600
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2900
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France400
Greece600
Croatia500
Hungary500
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2200
Portugal400
Romania900
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 574 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.87 559 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote518 for, 87 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 539 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 487 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.86 563 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 500 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.85 572 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.84 570 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 544 voters
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 32 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSeparate vote483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 13 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179607, reference 2025/2654(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179607 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179607,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179607}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179607},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179607, reference 2025/2654(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}