Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 1

Second World Summit for Social Development

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 1
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
478 for · 69 against · 65 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:29
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 25 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP, ECR
Official label
B10-0408/2025 – § 4/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0408
Dossier
2025/2654(RSP)
Vote id
179591
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 478 for, 69 against, 65 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Stresses the importance of using the Social Scoreboard and the Social Convergence Framework to identify risks and to track progress towards achieving upward social convergence, reducing inequalities, strengthening social protection systems and promoting decent working conditions and supportive measures to ensure fairness in the transitions; stresses that, in this regard, it is necessary to ensure a sustainable, socially just and inclusive Europe where social rights are fully protected and safeguarded; recalls that EU citizens identify a social Europe as one of their priorities;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 99Against 0Abst. 0No vote 37 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 52Against 9Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
EPPFor 172Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 51Against 12Abst. 3No vote 13 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 0Against 20Abst. 58No vote 7 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.62
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 5Abst. 3No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria600
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France600
Greece600
Croatia500
Hungary500
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2100
Portugal400
Romania900
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 547 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 503 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 504 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.81 561 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 575 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Final534 for, 102 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.81 595 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 579 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 502 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 505 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.80 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179591
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179591, reference 2025/2654(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179591 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179591,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Second World Summit for Social Development}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179591}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179591},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179591, reference 2025/2654(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}