Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 7

Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 11 Sept 2025
Result
83 for · 354 against · 110 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 September 2025, 13:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 22 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 7 - Am 8
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0366
Dossier
2025/2855(RSP)
Vote id
178871
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 83 for, 354 against, 110 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 0Abst. 100No vote 34 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 0Against 58Abst. 0No vote 17 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 149Abst. 1No vote 38 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 55Abst. 0No vote 24 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 2Against 67Abst. 3No vote 13 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 13Against 5Abst. 5No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1000
Denmark200
Spain300
Finland100
France400
Italy100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 547 members

No vote recorded, 172

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 172 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 513 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 364 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 523 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 369 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 522 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment99 for, 395 against, 96 abstained Rejected For 17 %r · shared0.87 464 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 39 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment99 for, 424 against, 121 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 494 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment112 for, 330 against, 124 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 431 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 367 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment139 for, 392 against, 139 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 509 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178871
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 7 — Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks”. Vote, 11 September 2025. votingId 178871, reference 2025/2855(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178871 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-11-178871,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 7 — Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178871}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178871},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178871, reference 2025/2855(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}