Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 6, after paragraph 6

Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks

Vote
Amendment 6, after paragraph 6
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 11 Sept 2025
Result
89 for · 360 against · 120 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 September 2025, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 22 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 6 - Am 6
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0366
Dossier
2025/2855(RSP)
Vote id
178869
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 89 for, 360 against, 120 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 1Abst. 105No vote 28 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 2Against 55Abst. 2No vote 16 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 0Against 152Abst. 0No vote 36 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 5No vote 13 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 3Against 16Abst. 5No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 3No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France600
Greece100
Ireland100
Italy700
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

No vote recorded, 150

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 150 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 535 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment112 for, 330 against, 124 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 450 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment138 for, 391 against, 107 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 508 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 385 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 541 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonOther181 for, 259 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 41 %r · shared0.86 348 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 93 to recital 22 Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsAmendment124 for, 398 against, 118 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 509 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 449 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 541 voters
15 Dec 2025Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker) Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)Other181 for, 261 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 40 %r · shared0.85 360 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178869
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 6, after paragraph 6 — Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks”. Vote, 11 September 2025. votingId 178869, reference 2025/2855(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178869 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-11-178869,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 6, after paragraph 6 — Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178869}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178869},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178869, reference 2025/2855(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}