Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to vote on amendments

Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review

Vote
Proposal to vote on amendments
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 10 Sept 2025
Result
151 for · 495 against · 19 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 September 2025, 14:18
More facts (5)
Position
vote 2 of 16 on the decision
Official label
A10-0129/2025 - Dragoş Benea - Demande de procéder au vote sur les amendements
Text
Report A-10-2025-0129
Dossier
2025/0084(COD)
Vote id
178766
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 151 for, 495 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 17Against 99Abst. 13No vote 7 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
RenewFor 19Against 48Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
EPPFor 0Against 175Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 15Against 65Abst. 1No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 16Against 12Abst. 2No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland030
France060
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary060
Ireland040
Italy080
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands060
Poland0200
Portugal060
Romania090
Sweden050
Slovenia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 15 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment123 for, 486 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 572 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment110 for, 549 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 615 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.74 457 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2024Amendment 5 to paragraph 13 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2023Amendment116 for, 518 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 603 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 611 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment118 for, 518 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 606 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment121 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.73 608 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment122 for, 534 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 615 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment129 for, 529 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 612 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment107 for, 538 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178766
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to vote on amendments — Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review”. Vote, 10 September 2025. votingId 178766, reference 2025/0084(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178766 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-10-178766,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to vote on amendments — Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178766}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178766},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178766, reference 2025/0084(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}