Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
462 for · 142 against · 63 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 September 2025, 14:25
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 8 of 8 on the decision
Official label
A10-0139/2025 - Marcos Ros Sempere - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Vote id
178281
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 462 for, 142 against, 63 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 6No vote 7 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 53Against 5Abst. 9No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
EPPFor 125Against 41Abst. 11No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
ECRFor 58Against 13Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 8Against 52Abst. 21No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 12Against 6Abst. 12No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria002
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Germany305
Denmark120
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland500
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal002
Romania300
Sweden030
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 1 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeSplit vote518 for, 74 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.72 613 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the RegionsFinal549 for, 97 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.72 625 voters
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSeparate vote379 for, 180 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 577 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Role of cohesion policy in supporting the just transitionFinal519 for, 99 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.71 664 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal538 for, 96 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.70 622 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the RegionsFinal548 for, 110 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.70 627 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 1 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote442 for, 134 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.70 583 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Final534 for, 102 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.70 648 voters
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on recital B Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSeparate vote555 for, 94 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.70 618 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.69 613 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the whole text — Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis”. Vote, 10 September 2025. votingId 178281, reference 2024/2120(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178281 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-10-178281,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Role of cohesion policy investment in resolving the current housing crisis}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178281}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178281},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178281, reference 2024/2120(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}