Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 21, after recital AE

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 21, after recital AE
Result
254 for · 356 against · 37 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 85 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le considérant AE - Am 21
Vote id
178692
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 254 for, 356 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 22Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
EPPFor 12Against 161Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 1Against 68Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 52Abst. 30No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 6Abst. 7No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria120
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia010
Spain100
Finland030
France1110
Ireland130
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania120
Sweden030
Slovenia110
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 518 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 613 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 559 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.85 595 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment202 for, 346 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 508 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 14 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Separate vote258 for, 321 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 551 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment205 for, 344 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 508 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote220 for, 319 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.85 522 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 427 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 530 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 21, after recital AE — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178692, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178692 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178692,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 21, after recital AE — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178692}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178692},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178692, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}