Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 28, after paragraph 82

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 28, after paragraph 82
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
264 for · 373 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:07
More facts (6)
Position
vote 66 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 82 - Am 28
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178672
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 1Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 19Against 47Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.57
EPPFor 29Against 140Abst. 2No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 82Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 8No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France1100
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1610
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania1100
Sweden400
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 519 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 4 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote339 for, 325 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.86 612 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 534 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 531 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 598 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 536 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.83 488 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsSplit vote278 for, 326 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 564 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178672
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 28, after paragraph 82 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178672, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178672 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178672,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 28, after paragraph 82 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178672}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178672},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178672, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}