Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 37 to paragraph 67

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 37 to paragraph 67
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
280 for · 338 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:05
More facts (6)
Position
vote 56 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, ECR
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 67 - Am 37
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178662
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 43 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 0Abst. 8No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 45Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 2No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 18Against 48Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
EPPFor 7Against 163Abst. 0No vote 18 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 0Against 60Abst. 8No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 44Against 37Abst. 1No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
ESNFor 3Against 21Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 7No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
France100
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2024Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment255 for, 314 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 586 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 146 to recital 15 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment263 for, 299 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 584 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 557 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 556 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 558 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 498 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 599 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 577 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 558 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment215 for, 313 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 502 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178662
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178662, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178662 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178662,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178662}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178662},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178662, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}