Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 35 to paragraph 66

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 35 to paragraph 66
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
236 for · 369 against · 43 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:04
More facts (6)
Position
vote 53 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, ECR
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 66 - Am 35
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178659
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 1Abst. 2No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 23Against 42Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
EPPFor 1Against 172Abst. 1No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 7Against 46Abst. 29No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 14Abst. 11No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia080
Denmark010
Spain060
France0029
Greece010
Hungary0110
Italy700
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 27 to paragraph 27 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment233 for, 303 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 528 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 37 to Article 4, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, point b Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment217 for, 409 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.85 605 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 579 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 581 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 61, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 518 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 558 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 20 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote281 for, 361 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 606 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 1 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment246 for, 379 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 612 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178659
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178659, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178659 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178659,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178659}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178659},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178659, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}