Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 63 — part 2

Public procurement

Vote
Paragraph 63 — part 2
Result
553 for · 82 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 37 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 63/2
Vote id
178644
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘such as binding collective agreements, minimum employment standards, equal pay provisions, and other relevant social criteria; welcomes the clarification by the CJEU that the social and environmental obligations in the Horizontal Social Clause are ‘a cardinal value with which the Member States must ensure compliance’;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 8Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 64Against 5Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 28Against 45Abst. 9No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ESNFor 2Against 22Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 24Against 2Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Germany080
Denmark300
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1100
Ireland500
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 566 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 521 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 504 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote478 for, 68 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.79 545 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote415 for, 97 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 511 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.75 645 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital D — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote426 for, 72 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 524 voters
11 Feb 2025Recital H — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote538 for, 83 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 582 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 78 — part 4 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote502 for, 68 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.74 586 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.74 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 63 — part 2 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178644, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178644 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178644,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 63 — part 2 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178644}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178644},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178644, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}