Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 46 — part 2

Public procurement

Vote
Paragraph 46 — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
475 for · 152 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 14:00
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - § 46/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178631
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls on the Member States to encourage business participation in cross-border public procurement by refraining from using language criteria to decline bids in tender procedures;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 29Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
GreensFor 41Against 5Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 56Against 10Abst. 3No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 6No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 11No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria600
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2900
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland400
France600
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary600
Ireland200
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2000
Portugal500
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 88 The European Water Resilience StrategySeparate vote460 for, 165 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 583 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesFinal492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.87 609 voters
2 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIFinal441 for, 173 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.87 619 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Final469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.86 618 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.86 603 voters
9 Sept 2025Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.85 648 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 42 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote476 for, 104 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 584 voters
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesFinal448 for, 161 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 590 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote484 for, 140 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 579 voters
8 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Security of energy supply in the EUSeparate vote505 for, 115 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178631
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 46 — part 2 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178631, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178631 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178631,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 46 — part 2 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178631}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178631},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178631, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}