Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4, after paragraph 6

Public procurement

Vote
Amendment 4, after paragraph 6
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
362 for · 226 against · 54 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:57
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 90 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0147/2025 - Piotr Müller - Après le § 6 - Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0147
Dossier
2024/2103(INI)
Vote id
178615
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 1No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 2Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 24Against 39Abst. 3No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
EPPFor 47Against 116Abst. 8No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
ECRFor 17Against 30Abst. 19No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.18
PatriotsFor 53Against 14Abst. 14No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ESNFor 3Against 19Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 8No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.65 555 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 5 to recital G EU actions against the Russian shadow fleets and ensuring a full enforcement of sanctions against RussiaAmendment252 for, 318 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.64 566 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 11, adding text before paragraph 1 Situation in VenezuelaAmendment251 for, 322 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 541 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.61 556 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.61 554 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.61 582 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 146 to recital 15 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment263 for, 299 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.60 578 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment202 for, 330 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 501 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.60 495 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.60 551 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178615
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4, after paragraph 6 — Public procurement”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178615, reference 2024/2103(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178615 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178615,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4, after paragraph 6 — Public procurement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178615}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178615},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178615, reference 2024/2103(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}