Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 388 to article 18, paragraph 1

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 388 to article 18, paragraph 1
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
124 for · 515 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 49 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 18, § 1 - Am 388
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178597
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 21Against 102Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
RenewFor 3Against 62Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 3Against 169Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 11Against 71Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 3Against 21Abst. 4No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Germany261
Spain010
France010
Greece102
Luxembourg010
Poland001
Romania020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 20 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment111 for, 494 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.86 558 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment110 for, 549 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 593 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment117 for, 536 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment114 for, 539 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 588 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 581 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment121 for, 533 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 586 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment113 for, 549 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 591 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 569 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 582 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178597
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 388 to article 18, paragraph 1 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178597, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178597 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178597,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 388 to article 18, paragraph 1 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178597}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178597},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178597, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}