Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 403 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 403 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
192 for · 442 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 41 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, S&D
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 2 - Am 403S
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178591
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 64Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 6Against 157Abst. 9No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 65Against 2Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 81Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 11Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 270 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment176 for, 382 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 519 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 530 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.94 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 590 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 571 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment187 for, 437 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.94 568 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment190 for, 415 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 570 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment194 for, 444 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment199 for, 451 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 584 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 54 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment185 for, 423 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.94 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178591
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 403 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178591, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178591 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178591,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 403 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178591}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178591},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178591, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}