Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 402 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 402 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
194 for · 434 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 38 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, S&D
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6, § 1, alinéa 1 - Am 402
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178589
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 156Abst. 12No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 66Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 20Against 5Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.99 527 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.98 590 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment187 for, 437 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.98 566 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 569 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 588 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 585 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 593 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 586 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment186 for, 447 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 586 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment194 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 586 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178589
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 402 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178589, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178589 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178589,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 402 to article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178589}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178589},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178589, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}