Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 133 — part 2 to article 6

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 133 — part 2 to article 6
Result
512 for · 122 against · 15 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Greens · separate vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 133/2
Vote id
178582
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 31Abst. 4No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 3Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 170Against 3Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 63Against 5Abst. 1No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 79Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 5Against 20Abst. 1No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 10Against 10Abst. 9No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain010
Finland030
France060
Greece004
Ireland020
Italy080
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote480 for, 112 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 552 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.85 582 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote467 for, 116 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 549 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 53 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote480 for, 111 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 558 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.80 510 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 120 to Article 19, after paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) — part 3 Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment502 for, 128 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 583 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 11 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote477 for, 120 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.80 555 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 21 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote487 for, 125 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.79 563 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote493 for, 114 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.79 556 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 10 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote474 for, 123 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.78 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 133 — part 2 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178582, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178582 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178582,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 133 — part 2 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178582}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178582},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178582, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}