Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 133 — part 1 to article 6

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 133 — part 1 to article 6
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
505 for · 126 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 30 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Greens · separate vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 133/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178581
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘unless the lack of availability or excessive prices of specific recycled plastics makes compliance with that target excessively difficult.’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 8No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 59Against 6Abst. 2No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 0Against 82Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 12Abst. 9No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain100
Finland300
France600
Greece400
Ireland200
Italy800
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 611 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal526 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.93 604 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal519 for, 126 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.92 600 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.92 589 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.92 603 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal532 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.90 602 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.90 592 voters
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 612 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 71 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote439 for, 100 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 517 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.89 560 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178581
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 133 — part 1 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178581, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178581 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178581,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 133 — part 1 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178581}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178581},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178581, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}