Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 401 to article 6

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 401 to article 6
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
131 for · 447 against · 72 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, S&D
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 6 - Am 401S
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178578
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 20 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 162Abst. 12No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 12Against 1Abst. 55No vote 11 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 26Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 12Abst. 5No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 650 members

No vote recorded, 69

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 69 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to Article 15 Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situationsAmendment128 for, 454 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 578 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after Article 4; Regulation (EC) No 816/2006 Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situationsAmendment131 for, 472 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 600 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 12 to recital Q Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment141 for, 464 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 610 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment113 for, 431 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 552 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment130 for, 447 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 585 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 2 to Article 5 Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situationsAmendment132 for, 467 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.93 599 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 258, adding text after recital 23 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment179 for, 387 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 515 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 29 2023 and 2024 reports on KosovoAmendment106 for, 396 against, 76 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 520 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 259, adding text after recital 26 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment178 for, 385 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 511 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 257 to recital 15 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment180 for, 392 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 522 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178578
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 401 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178578, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178578 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178578,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 401 to article 6 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178578}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178578},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178578, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}