Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 398 to article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 398 to article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
199 for · 437 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, après le point 9 - Am 398
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178574
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 124Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 16Against 151Abst. 7No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 61Against 6Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 17Against 9Abst. 2No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria101
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany810
Spain100
France010
Greece110
Luxembourg100
Poland001
Romania200
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 270 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment176 for, 382 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 518 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment201 for, 399 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 577 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 20 to Article 1, after point 23 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment193 for, 451 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.92 594 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 103 to Article 1 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment182 for, 441 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.91 581 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 548 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment209 for, 434 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.91 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 14 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment223 for, 410 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 574 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 54 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment185 for, 423 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.91 566 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital 17 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment197 for, 458 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.91 601 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAmendment203 for, 445 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 591 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178574
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 398 to article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178574, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178574 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178574,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 398 to article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178574}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178574},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178574, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}