Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 397 to article 3, paragraph 1, point 9

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Amendment 397 to article 3, paragraph 1, point 9
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
158 for · 471 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:41
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 67 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, S&D
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Article 3, § 1, point 9 - Am 397
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178573
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 125Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 8Against 160Abst. 6No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 28Against 33Abst. 5No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 16Against 7Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment131 for, 513 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.89 602 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurementAmendment183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 638 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment121 for, 404 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.88 514 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 2 Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Amendment176 for, 509 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 627 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 29 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment142 for, 426 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 546 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment140 for, 493 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.87 584 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment127 for, 497 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 608 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 270 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment176 for, 382 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 515 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment151 for, 405 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 530 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 110 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment107 for, 482 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178573
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 397 to article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178573, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178573 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178573,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 397 to article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178573}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178573},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178573, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}