Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
431 for · 145 against · 76 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:48
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 66 of 67 on the decision
Official label
A10-0158/2025 - Jens Gieseke, Paulius Saudargas - Proposition de la Commission
Text
Report A-10-2025-0158
Dossier
2023/0284(COD)
Vote id
178472
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 23Abst. 11No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 0Against 0Abst. 47No vote 6 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 3No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 62Against 7Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 6No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 14Abst. 9No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria600
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2900
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland400
France600
Greece700
Croatia600
Hungary600
Ireland200
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2000
Portugal500
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureFinal430 for, 107 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.91 591 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.90 606 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Final469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 620 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Impact of artificial intelligence on the financial sectorFinal426 for, 182 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 597 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureSeparate vote484 for, 140 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.88 580 voters
11 Feb 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Central Bank – annual report 2024Final378 for, 233 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.88 580 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesFinal492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.86 612 voters
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 88 The European Water Resilience StrategySeparate vote460 for, 165 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 586 voters
2 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIFinal441 for, 173 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.85 621 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 648 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178472
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178472, reference 2023/0284(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178472 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178472,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178472}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178472},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178472, reference 2023/0284(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}