Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 10 Jul 2025
Result
523 for · 75 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:18
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 11 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0331
Dossier
2025/2800(RSP)
Vote id
178231
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 31Abst. 3No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 167Against 1Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 69Against 0Abst. 3No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 61Against 5Abst. 0No vote 19 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 6Against 15Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus001
Czechia020
Germany061
France100
Greece220
Luxembourg100
Romania011
Slovakia041

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.91 487 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 515 voters
23 Jan 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Separate vote521 for, 66 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 527 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 519 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point g EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote538 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.87 558 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 515 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 257 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote507 for, 72 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 517 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.85 563 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote460 for, 72 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 483 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.84 456 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178231
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the whole text — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178231, reference 2025/2800(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178231 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178231,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178231}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178231},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178231, reference 2025/2800(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}