Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 13

Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 13
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 10 Jul 2025
Result
95 for · 420 against · 119 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:17
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 13 – Am 8
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0331
Dossier
2025/2800(RSP)
Vote id
178229
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 95 for, 420 against, 119 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 29Against 15Abst. 8No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
S&DFor 9Against 1Abst. 104No vote 22 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 169Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 3No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 17Against 7Abst. 1No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria005
Belgium103
Bulgaria002
Germany0012
Denmark003
Estonia002
Spain1015
Finland002
France0011
Greece001
Croatia400
Hungary100
Ireland001
Italy0018
Lithuania002
Luxembourg100
Malta003
Netherlands013
Poland003
Portugal107
Romania005
Sweden005
Slovenia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 634 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment66 for, 368 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 512 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 571 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 423 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 572 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 572 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 434 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 572 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 22 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment97 for, 367 against, 161 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 551 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 7, adding text after recital B Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment70 for, 379 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 12 %r · shared0.82 525 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 501 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178229
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 13 — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178229, reference 2025/2800(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178229 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178229,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 13 — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178229}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178229},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178229, reference 2025/2800(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}