Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after paragraph 2

Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

Vote
Amendment 3, after paragraph 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 10 Jul 2025
Result
63 for · 552 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 3
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0331
Dossier
2025/2800(RSP)
Vote id
178221
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 63 for, 552 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 10 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 1Abst. 5No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 4Against 47Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
S&DFor 6Against 111Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 168Abst. 0No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 2No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 2Against 67Abst. 0No vote 16 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 6No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 17Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria110
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany600
France001
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Romania011
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

No vote recorded, 89

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 89 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 19 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Amendment66 for, 574 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 584 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment78 for, 582 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 596 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAmendment72 for, 459 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 512 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 55 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment75 for, 566 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 569 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating repression of the Baha’is in IranAmendment79 for, 493 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 515 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 16 Clean Industrial DealAmendment67 for, 480 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 511 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 66 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment73 for, 558 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 570 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment67 for, 501 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 552 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 12 Clean Industrial DealAmendment62 for, 497 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 518 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 57 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment72 for, 561 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 575 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178221
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 3, after paragraph 2 — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178221, reference 2025/2800(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178221 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178221,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after paragraph 2 — Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178221}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178221},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178221, reference 2025/2800(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}