Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after recital 2

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies

Vote
Amendment 2, after recital 2
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 10 Jul 2025
Result
210 for · 429 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 July 2025, 13:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0134
Dossier
2025/0129(COD)
Vote id
178188
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 210 for, 429 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 52Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 18 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 65Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 16Against 153Abst. 7No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 76Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 1No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria110
Cyprus001
Czechia200
Germany610
France100
Greece130
Luxembourg100
Romania200
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 20 Clean Industrial DealAmendment184 for, 371 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 528 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment209 for, 434 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 592 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment208 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.95 534 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.95 533 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 14 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment223 for, 410 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 582 voters
12 Mar 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Split vote174 for, 389 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 518 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 92 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment211 for, 410 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.95 574 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 564 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 31, adding text after recital D Clean Industrial DealAmendment183 for, 380 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 529 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 5 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178188
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 2, after recital 2 — Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies”. Vote, 10 July 2025. votingId 178188, reference 2025/0129(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178188 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-10-178188,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after recital 2 — Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178188}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-10/178188},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178188, reference 2025/0129(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}